I say

In my opinions, argument is kind of a way to lead somebody to learn and accept something new. Because of that when you argue with something, you need to show your evidences to support your claims no matter you agree with or disagree with. And, base on these evidences you posted, the audiences start to learn it and try to accept it. So, if they accepted your point, that means you success in your argument; if not, you may need to think more about your paper. In “They say, I say”, it also says that you need to give reasons why you disagree or not. In addition to that, in “They say, I say”, it point out that when we want to argue with something, we need to declare our position directly as well. But sometimes, most of us would like to say lots of evidences or examples or the summary of the quote then show out their position, and this is in order to want their paper looks more complex and reasonable or intelligence. I think that is right to say something then post out your point, but what is the “something” should be? In “They say, I say”, it gives us a very useful answer: a brief introduction or summary of what you are going to argue with. Because of that neither everybody read what you read nor experienced what you experienced. If you start your point directly, some of your audiences who did not read the target you are arguing would confuse what you are talking about and this would make your paper lack of subtraction. General speaking, this paper (“They say, I say”) gives us a very useful way to start our argument paper and make it stronger. And it not only tells us the methods but also gives us lots of examples. It is really good to us.